logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 09. 선고 2016두735 판결
(심리불속행)상고인의 주장은 상고심 절차에 관한 특례법 제4조에 해당하여 이유 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu166 (Law No. 12, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2009west1483 (Law No. 9.30, 2009)

Title

(Incompetence of Hearing) Appellant’s argument is without merit as it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Procedure for Appeal.

Summary

The argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act

Related statutes

Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Procedure for Final Appeal

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du735 Decided global income tax and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

-Appellee

IsaA

Defendant-Appellee

-Appellant

○○ Head of Tax Office and one other

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2015Nu166 (Law No. 12, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

2016.09.09

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal and it is without merit, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow