A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person shall interfere with the business of a person performing public duties due to an act of God, etc. without any provision of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

On October 25, 2019, at around 19:12, the Defendant: (a) called the 112 reporting center at the 112 reporting center without reporting; (b) and (c) called the 112 reporting center; and (d) called the 112 reporting center at the 112 reporting center in total from around that time to November 1, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the receipt of reports and orders by C, etc. from around 10 times in total, as described in the attached list of crimes.

2. On November 23, 2019, the Defendant attempted to damage the above patrol vehicle, which is an object used by public offices, such as: (a) the F rocketing patrol vehicle 13 affiliated with the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station, in front of the “E” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, without any special reason, at around November 23, 2019; (b) the Defendant attempted to damage the said patrol vehicle, which is an object used by the said public offices, such as: (c) the front of the patrol vehicle, in front of the patrol vehicle; (d) but (e) failed to perform its intended purpose as a police officer’s restraint.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place of the preceding paragraph and at the same time and place of the performance of performance of official duties, was asked from G (the age 52) of the Yeongdeungpo Police Station in charge of the police station called “I would like to die because I would have been sentenced to imprisonment because I would like to find out who would have been inside the satch satch satch,” who had been on board the patrol vehicle and had been on board the patrol vehicle at the time and place of the preceding paragraph, and raised objections to this G, and threatened the police officer with his hair as if he had been on the satis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Photographss of belt belts, bracks of patrol vehicles, caps and photographs to capture fracks of bracks, refrack images, and images of crime prevention CCTVs;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from victims);

1. Cinematographic CD.