(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.06.23 2020고단282

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.06.23 2020고단282

공용서류무효미수등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since the defendant is led to confession, it is necessary to make an additional statement on the same part as the relevant supporting evidence in the same way as “(see, e.g., the page of the evidence record).”

Based on evidence, the prosecutor's facts charged are modified to the extent that it does not adversely affect the defendant's right of defense and actually affect the contents of the facts charged, and it does not result in the change of the subject of trial by the court.

1. Around 00:30 on March 1, 2020, the Defendant attempted to damage public goods, under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the “C” building located in the mountain of the 1112 patrolr, and was reported on the 4th line in the direction of the road, and 112; the police officer called the Defendant, who was dispatched to the site, “the Defendant will come home and go home again”; and the Defendant continued to display the combined part between the patrolr and the 112 patrolr’sless antenna on his hand (see, e.g., evidence record). The Defendant attempted to damage the said patrolr’s driver’s seat in front and rear front, and did not have attempted to do so by the police officer around the said patrol while trying to damage the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to damage the patrol car, which is an object used by public offices.

2. On March 1, 2020, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the circumstances described in Paragraph 1, and was compelled to go to the F Area E located in YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY 00:40 on March 1, 2020, and the Defendant used spitation (see, e.g., the evidence record, e., the page of the police officer, who is the police officer who oversees the Defendant’s escape and performs his official duties once a week, and who continues to go to be tightly (see, e.g., Articles 23 and 24 of the evidence record).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

(i) the evidence;

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2020.12.09 2020노374

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.08.10 2016고합40

-서울북부지방법원 2020.06.10 2020고단1111

-광주지방법원 2015.08.06 2015고단195

-서울남부지방법원 2020.03.11 2019고단6261