1. Defendant C and the Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association shall jointly and severally file for the Plaintiff A with the Plaintiff KRW 46,000,000, and Defendant C with respect thereto.

The summary of the case is that the defendant C (Plaintiff A-Lease case) and D (Plaintiff B-Lease case) who was a licensed real estate agent who failed to fulfill the obligation of the plaintiffs to confirm the legal relationship, such as the deposit, of other lessees, have leased the room of the multi-family house due to the mistake of the plaintiffs, but has suffered damage from the failure to recover the deposit at all due to the successful bid, and thus, the defendant A-2 million won (the plaintiff's negligence 20%) applying the liability ratio of 80% (the deposit 15 million won x 80%) to the amount equivalent to the deposit (the deposit 10 million won x the deposit 65 million won x 80%) and the compensation amount of the plaintiff B-52 million won (the deposit 65 million won x 80%) to the defendants, who are the mutual aid business entity related to the liability of the licensed real

On the premise of fact, Defendant C is a licensed real estate agent operating real estate brokerage business under the trade name of the Defendants’ status and mutual aid agreement, and Defendant D is a real estate agent operating real estate brokerage business.

As between the Defendant Association, Defendant C entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant Association to compensate the parties to a transaction for the damage within the limit of KRW 100 million if the damage was incurred to the parties to the transaction due to intention or negligence in conducting real estate brokerage by setting the deduction period from October 16, 2012 to October 15, 2013, and Defendant D entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant Association to compensate for the damage within the limit of KRW 100 million.

The Plaintiffs, as indicated in the following table 1, leased a multi-family house and sold buildings, leased a multi-family house and a multi-family house for the 4th class neighborhood living facilities and multi-family houses (the 6th class, 4th class, each of 2, 3th class, and 4th class) owned by G from G to the brokerage of the Defendants, and received a fixed date.

Defendant C. (a) on July 4, 2013, July 22, 2013, 2013, Plaintiff B B 1, B 302, the date of concluding the contract for the settlement of the lessee’s home room, and KRW 65 million on July 4, 2013, Defendant D2, Plaintiff A405, July 16, 2013, August 19, 2013, Defendant C.