logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.27 2017고정1762
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2012, the Defendant and C submitted a marriage report and documents necessary for marriage, such as a false statement of marriage, a false certificate of unmarried person, etc., prepared by a public official in charge of marriage who is aware of the fact, to the public official in charge of marriage, and to the public official in charge of marriage, including a false statement of marriage and a false certificate of unmarried person against the Defendant, which are recorded in the Gu office in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, for the extension of the visa period of the Defendant. The facts are merely a marriage report for the purpose of extending the visa period of the Defendant, and the facts are recorded in the column of the husband of the marriage report in the form of “A”, “C” and “C” and “A” regardless of the absence of the intention to

As above, the Defendant jointly filed a false report with C, thereby allowing the public official to record false facts in the electronic records processing system for family relations, which is an electronic records, and around that time, exercised the computerized information system for family relations in which false facts are recorded.

2. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant and C submitted an application for change of status of stay, marriage relation certificates, monthly rent contracts, certificates of personal history of four arms and selling countries, certificates of personal identification, copies of bankbooks, monetary records, statements, certificates of marriage relationship between four arms and selling countries, and original copies of the English marriage relation certificates, which may be known to the public official in charge of obtaining permission for change of status of stay.

In common with C, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the issue of stay status of immigration control officials by means of the aforementioned deceptive scheme.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Marriage report, certificate of unmarried person in four arms, application for change of status of stay, certificate of marriage relation, and certificate of marriage;

arrow