A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months and a fine of up to five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) leased Nos. 307, 809, 1312, 1515, 1620, and 1913 of Mapo-gu Seoul Etel; and (b) decided that the Defendant’s employees engaged in sexual traffic, including F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and L, advertisement of sexual traffic through the Internet site “M,” “N,” etc., shall exercise overall control over the business of sexual traffic; and (c) the Defendant’s sexual buyers who reported and contacted the said advertisement, shall receive sexual traffic payment from the sexual buyers who received sexual traffic payment and have sexual intercourse with the female employees engaged in sexual traffic.

Around September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with the foregoing D, received KRW 1.50,000 from the P to engage in commercial sex acts; and (b) requested F, an employee of commercial sex acts, to engage in commercial sex acts; and (c) in collusion with the said D, arranged commercial sex acts in the same manner from August 31, 2016 to October 25, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of some of the police officers against the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against F, G, H, P, I, J, K, or L;

1. Each protocol of seizure, a voluntary submission, and a list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of enforcement site photographs, field photographs, and statutes;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19(2)1 of the same Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 24 of the same Act shall be concurrently punished by imprisonment and a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in order to conceal the business owner, notwithstanding the fact that the defendant continued to be engaged in business even though he was subject to several times of the crime of this case, or was the chief at the time of control.