logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고단1364
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 8,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a sexual traffic business in the name of “B”.

After the lease of Seoul Gangnam-gu Ctel 720 and 1114, the Defendant advertised commercial sex acts through adult Internet site “D”, “E”, “F, etc., and had pre-employed female employees of G, etc. engage in commercial sex acts, such as G, who reported and contacted the above advertisement, receive KRW 110,000 won for 60 minutes from the male purchase who received 150,000 won for 90,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts, and caused them to have the male and female sexual intercourses under the above several times.

On June 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sought 300,000 won for commercial sex acts from H, which was found in order to report advertisements and engage in commercial sex acts; (b) provided guidance to the above officetels 1114, in which there is a female employee of commercial sex acts employed in advance to allow the above G to engage in commercial sex acts similar to the H; and (c) arranged commercial sex acts by the same method from June 17, 2016 to June 30, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. Suppression photographs and closure photographs of the contents of mobile phone conversations;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of passbook;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging and Arranging Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, and both punishment of imprisonment and fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes and did not repeat the crime, and the defendant again committed the crime in this case even though he had the record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million by the Seoul Central District Court on January 13, 2016 due to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Traffic Arrangement, Etc. (Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts) in the Seoul Central District Court on January 13, 2016.

arrow