A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B conspired with C and D on February 16, 201, in collusion with the Defendant and B, at the residence of 103-dong 110, 110 of the Daegu Northern-gu building E-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Seoul-gu, and at the location of D on February 16, 2011, concluded a lease agreement with the victim company's business employees who would normally pay for the rent to those in a normal condition and would return the product at the expiration of the lease period, and then, they received delivery of the above business employees' name as follows: (a) the amount equivalent to KRW 2,750,000 of the market price of one ice, which is equivalent to KRW 2,820,00,000 in the total market price of three ice purification machines; (b) the amount equivalent to KRW 880,000 in the market price of one food treatment machine; and (c) the amount equivalent to KRW 769,00 in the market price of one Ba.

The Defendant and B conspired with the above C and D, from that time until February 28, 2011, by deceiving the victim’s business operators’ business operators’ name in the aforementioned manner as stated in the attached Table 40 to 63, as in the list of crimes committed from that time, and received delivery of the total market value of KRW 29,896,00,00 in total, including water purifiers, water purifiers, air conditioners, and food treatment equipment.

On March 23, 2011, the Defendant prepared and submitted an application for a loan of KRW 690,076 each month to the person in charge of Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., who is the victim through H, who is an employee, at a 106-101 G agency of Busan-gu, Busan-gu, 106-101, stating that “The Defendant would pay KRW 26.7 million each month until March 20, 2015,” to the person in charge of Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., the victim, who is the victim, for a loan of KRW 26.7 million.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay installments of the victim company even if he received a loan from the victim company due to the absence of certain occupation or property.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving I, who is an employee of the victim company, obtained a loan of KRW 26.7 million from the victim company to obtain the purchase price of the vehicle from the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

"2012 Highest 7691"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B.