Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay the victim Q Q, who was engaged in the promotional activities for milk on the front side of the Daegu Suwon-gu P apartment, the Defendant would pay the victim’s name poorer who was the promotional member of the sales agency to Daegu Suwon-gu S and 102.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the milk price.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the employees of the victim, received three copies of gift certificates of KRW 50,00 from the victim’s employees, namely, from the victim’s seat, and from September 15, 2014 to January 2, 2015, the Defendant acquired 63 x 96 low-pressure disease of KRW 336,00 in the market price at the above place.

"2015 High Court Decision 2777"

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On April 27, 2014, the Defendant entered “Y” in the column of the subscriber to the mobile phone entrance application form, “V, Daegu-Gu W apartment 102-408, X, and the applicant column,” and signed “Y” on the name side of each of the following.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of Y, which is a private document.

B. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant signed the agreement confirmation of the pactact contract between the air conditioners and the signature column of personal information signed by the Defendant, stating “YY” in the form of personal information consent.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a siren contract in the name of Y, a private document on rights and obligations.

C. Around October 20, 2014, the Defendant signed the agreement on installment financing at the AAG 102, stating the Defendant’s “V, AB” and “Y” in the applicant column and signed the agreement on installment financing at the name of the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of installment financing agreement in the name of Y, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant is the date, time, and place mentioned in the above 1-A.