1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from March 30, 2011 to January 12, 2017.

Basic Facts

A. On March 29, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as the pain of the left-hand shoulder, the fall of the left-hand finger, the fall of a low fluority, the decline of a fluorial, and the decline in the move of a sloping site, etc., and was hospitalized in the Joseon University Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and received a light signboard removal method No. 5-6 on March 30, 201 through the front bank transit, No. 6-7 on March 30, 201 (hereinafter “instant operation”).

B. Before the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was in a state of paralysis in which the Plaintiff was unable to fluencing, even though the Plaintiff was fluencated due to all circumstances, except for the fact that the left top and the bad faith were somewhat deteriorated, but all of the movement was diminished after the instant surgery, and in particular, the Plaintiff was in a state of paralysis at all.

C. By April 14, 2011, the Plaintiff discharged the instant hospital from hospital upon receiving hospitalized treatment.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 3, 6, Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers in case of family number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the plaintiff's assertion to the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the request for the examination of medical records and the request for the supplementation of medical records to the head of the hospital of the original Mine University.

A. The Plaintiff was in almost normal condition prior to the instant surgery and did not have spawn infection in the same parts.

However, the status of the site after the instant surgery has much deteriorated than before the surgery, and both sides are unable to work entirely.

This is due to negligence, such as pressure on the apparatus inserted by the doctor in charge during the instant surgery or injury to the negorith.

Therefore, the defendant, who is the employer of the above doctor, is liable for damages to the plaintiff.

B. When the Plaintiff performs the instant surgery from a physician before receiving the instant surgery, the Plaintiff may be able to undergo a legacy, such as paralysis, etc.

The high-speed signal bottle, which appears in the MRI image, shall be complete even if it is performed.