A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 1993, the Defendant entered into a check contract with a Switzerland branch of Korea (former bank) and the Defendant, and received a disposition of suspension of transaction from the said bank on May 7, 2014 while doing check transactions.

On February 25, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “G”, the check amount “3,00,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance “the above bank household check under the name of the Defendant on June 5, 2014” in the F office operated by the Defendant on the first floor of the city in Busan, Busan, the Busan, and the same year from February 25, 2014, including that the said bank bank bank check was issued in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “the date of issuance,” but the said bank bank check was presented to the Defendant during the period of presentment for payment, but was not paid due to the suspension of transaction.

4. From 20. up to 20., as shown in the table of crime Nos. 2 to 15, a check was issued in the aggregate amount of KRW 42,00,000, and was not paid due to the suspension of transaction, respectively.

"2014 Highest 2029"

1. On February 25, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “H”, the check amount “3,000,000,000,” and the issue date “as of September 5, 2014,” under the name of the Defendant.

On September 5, 2014, the holder of the household check presented the above household check payment scheme to the Bank at the above Sldrid on September 5, 2014.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. On March 30, 2014, the Defendant issued one check number I, check amount “3,00,000,000,” and issuance date “ September 25, 2014,” in the name of the Defendant in the above F Office.”

On September 25, 2014, the holder of the above household check presented the above coefficient mark to the Bank at the above Sldrid on September 25, 2014.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. Each household check;