logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.07.08 2014고단982
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. From February 13, 1996, the summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Director-Gun Branch of the NH Bank and the Defendant, and traded household checks under the name of the Defendant.

From February 25, 2014 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant issued one check number D, check amount, KRW 5,000,00, and issuance date under the name of the Defendant, “C” in the “C” office operated by the Defendant located in the Busan District captain-gun B, and one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant.

On March 25, 2014, the holder of the check presented the check to pay it at the place of origin in the Ulsan Bank of Korea.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

In addition, the defendant issued a total of eight times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1 (1), but failed to pay on the date of payment proposal due to the shortage of deposits.

around February 25, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “E”, “5,000,000,000,” and “date of issuance,” at the “C” office operated by the Defendant in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant.

On June 30, 2014, the holder of the check presented a payment proposal.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

In addition, the defendant issued the check three times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes (2) and did not receive the payment date as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

around February 25, 2014, the Defendant issued a copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant, “F”, “F”, “5,000,000,000”, and “F” under the name of the Defendant, which was the “F”, “F”, “F”, “5,000,000,” and “F” under the name of the Defendant, in the office of “C” operated by the Defendant in Busan-gun; and

On July 28, 2014, the holder of the check presented a payment proposal.

However, the defendant.

arrow