logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고단491
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power, etc.] On March 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act to the Seoul Eastern District Court on June, 201, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on March 25, 2014 and is currently under suspended sentence.

From May 6, 1989, the defendant entered into a check contract with the administrative fraternity of the national bank and her husband B, and traded household checks.

[2014 Highest 1028]

1. On October 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “E”, check amount “5,00,000,000,” and the date of issuance “FE” under the name of the Defendant’s “D” store operated by the Defendant in the Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu C market, and one copy of the bank check in the name of the above B.

On March 20, 2014, the holder of the check presented the check for payment within the period for presentment of payment.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. The Defendant issued a check number F, check amount “F”, “5,00,000,000,” and the date of issuance “F” under the above B’s name as of March 20, 2014.

On March 20, 2014, the holder of the check presented the check for payment within the period for presentment of payment.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

3. The Defendant issued a copy of the check number “G”, the check amount “5,00,000,000”, and the date of issuance “B” under the name of the above B, at the date and place under the above paragraph (1).

On March 20, 2014, the holder of the check presented the check for payment within the period for presentment of payment.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

[2014 Highest 491] On January 23, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “H,” “H,” “5,000,000 won,” and “Date of Issuance” under B’s name as “B on January 23, 2014.”

On January 23, 2014, the holder of the check at issue within the time limit for presentment for payment.

arrow