logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.13 2016고단490
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On June 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and ten months with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and on June 6, 2014, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the first prison for the North Korean defectors.

On February 3, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud with the District Court Goyang District Court on February 3, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 16, 2016.

[2016 Highest 490]

1. On September 4, 2015, the fraud Defendant posted a notice to the NAV Kabro-Ba stating that “The vehicle for Abane is sold.” The Defendant reported it to the victim C, who called the victim C, and sent it to the victim C by phone.”

However, there was no intention or ability to sell it because the defendant did not have a fluort for the above infant.

The Defendant received 800,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of D on the same day.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 1,770,000 in the same way five times from that time until September 9, 2015, as shown in Appendix I.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

[2016 Height714]

2. Fraud in victim E;

A. A. Around August 2014, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim E’s residence in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have to open the money to the side of the Gyeonggi-do Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do. If the Defendant obtained a loan from a savings bank in the name of NA and borrowed the money, the Defendant would pay interest on the loan, and would have paid the money more than the borrowed money when the principal is repaid later. At the last time, the Defendant would be able to work at all times.”

However, even if the victim borrows money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay interest or principal.

The defendant is a national bank in the name of the defendant around September 3, 2014 from the victim.

arrow