A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 25, 2010, the Defendant: (a) on the front of the house of the victim D (Woo, 67 years of age) located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu 3 Dong 101, the Defendant stated, “The Defendant would pay 30 million won to the Defendant for three months if he/she borrowed 30,000 won to purchase cream; and (b) received from the Defendant on September 27, 2010, KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s grandchildren to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of E, the Defendant’s grandchildren for the loan.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that he will invest in a multi-level company without using it as the purchase cost of Poscle, and there was no other property or revenue source, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money within the period of promise.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 28, 2010, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim’s house, such as the above Paragraph 1 above, and from the victim’s business to the victim’s business. It later received KRW 10 million from the victim’s bank account in the name of F in the name of F in the name of the Defendant’s borrowing on the same day.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not use it as business expenses, but did not intend to invest in a multi-level company. The Defendant did not have any other property or revenue source and did not have any intention or ability to repay the money within the agreed time limit.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. Around December 20, 2010, the Defendant borrowed 10,000 won to the victim’s “as money is required to operate his business,” at the same place as the above paragraph 2, from the victim. The Defendant later received KRW 5 million from the victim’s account in the name of the foregoing E on the same day, and KRW 5 million from the same account around the 21st day of the same month.

However, the defendant.