A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant served as a deputy head in charge of quality control, etc. of D companies that manufacture and supply machinery parts, such as bowlinging, in Boh City C.

The Defendant supplied to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration with seeering attached to the above K2 vehicle to Hyundai item (ju), and requested the company to deliver the seeering quality to the above K2 vehicle with the test report of an official agency that the above Defense Acquisition Program Administration satisfies the supply standards required by the above Defense Acquisition Program Administration. Around that time, the Defendant requested the Korea Testing and Research Institute for Construction and Living Environment of Korea, which is an official agency, to conduct a test for seeing samples, and issued the test report (sexual letter number: E) but the test result results did not meet the supply standards, making it impossible to supply them.

Accordingly, the defendant changed the above test report to arbitrarily meet the supply standards, and delivered the price of delivered goods.

1. On May 2012, the Defendant altered private documents, at the office of the foregoing D Company located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, copied the phrase “no corrosion occurred” in the corresponding part of “no corrosion occurred”, which is a test result of the test result (sexual record number: E) of the name of the president of the Korea Testing and Research Institute for Construction and Living Environment in the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant altered one copy of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Construction Living Environment Examination Institute, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

2. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant supplied the altered private document display and business obstruction to the Defendant at the 85 modern item (ju), Dongwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, under the above supply contract, and submitted the altered test report to the inspector in charge of inspection who is unaware of the name of the alteration as stated in the above 1. As such, the Defendant was the victim by deceptive means.