A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2008, the Defendant entered the Hanam-gun C (State)D and worked as the leader of the quality control team, and requested an authorized agency to test and analyze the original c-2, K-1, and original c-pin used as parts of the exclusive device, and submitted the test results received from the authorized agency to the modern item.

1. On January 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conducted a quality inspection at the foregoing D office; (b) even though there was no fact that the Gyeongnam Local Small and Medium Business Administration conducted a quality inspection at the Gyeongnam Local Small and Medium Business Administration, the Defendant prepared a test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of the Gyeongnam Local Small and Medium Business Administration, which was previously kept in custody, using multiple copies of the original test report under the name of the Administrator of the Gyeongnam Local Small and Medium Business Administration, and copied the number “2” in the number of the copies of the test report and the number of the copies thereof by attaching the above number in the number on the date of publication.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Gyeonggi-do Small and Medium Business Administration, which is an official document related to the certification of facts, from the above date to February 22, 2013, and forged the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration, which is an official document, in total six times from the above date to February 22, 201

2. Around August 2009, the Defendant altered official document: (a) copied the original test report to several copies; (b) removed the number “0” recorded in the reproduced test report into a knife; and (c) changed the “22%” as a result of the annual performance test to “20%” by attaching it to a knife another copy of the reproduced test report.

Accordingly, the Defendant, without authority, altered one copy of the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in Gyeongnam-si, which is an official document related to a certificate of fact without authority for the purpose of exercising, and the Defendant from the above date to August 22, 201