logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.02.03 2014고단2343
사기등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person in charge of quality assurance, quality control, etc. of E-company which manufactures and supplies hydrotensions D in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si.

The Defendant supplied F Co., Ltd. that supplies the tea (Ⅳ) to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, and requested F Co., Ltd. to deliver the body body, which is a component, to F Co., Ltd. with the test report of a public agency that the quality of body meets the supply standards as requested by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, but the Defendant was unable to supply the body within the payment period upon receipt of test report from a public agency.

Accordingly, the Defendant, which was previously issued and kept, changed the test report under the name of the CAM regional innovation center in order to arbitrarily comply with the supply standards, and issued the price of supply.

1. Around March 2013, the Defendant altered private documents issued on March 30, 2011 by E Co., Ltd. located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and then printed out the 15 items of the test report in the name of "five CAM regional innovation center precision measurement room" (sexual letter number (G) from 350.087 to 348,087; DEV's figures from 2.087 to 0.187; 0.087 to 0.00 to 0.00.0.0.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant modified one copy of the test report in the name of “a precision measurement room of Changwon University 5 CAM regional innovation centers,” which is a private document related to the certification of facts.

2. On April 3, 2013, the Defendant submitted the altered test report at the office of the above E-stock company, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, to the inspector in charge of the F-stock company, who was aware of the alteration, by electronic mail, as if it were the test report duly formed. The Defendant is thereby holding.

arrow