logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.09.06 2017고정1837
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:50 on March 23, 2017, the Defendant appeared at the court of Seoul Southern District Court No. 408, Seoul Southern District Court No. 408, which was located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the Defendant’s injury case No. 2016 No. 998, and was notified of the right to refuse to take an oath.

In the above court, the defendant was found to have committed the following acts: ① “The defendant was found to have taken flaps of this Section or flapsed by flaps and flapsed by C.

“B”’s inquiry by the defense counsel shall be without prejudice to C.

(3) spits or spits on the face of this Section.

The term "to ask questions of the counsel" shall also be examined.

It is essential that he/she testified, and (4) was written in a fact-finding document as it was in the mountain of the salary class around August 12, 2015, the fact that it was in the mountain of the salary class around 17:40.

In the case of “A’s inquiry by the counsel,” “A’s testimony,” and “A’s confirmation of this fact,” whether this case’s “B is paid to D.C.

In the meantime, spits or spits are considered to be spits in the face of C, which is required.

He did not spit "in the question of the prosecutor's question".

The testimony was made.

However, on August 12, 2015, the Defendant was aware that he spits C and satisf in the face by cutting down the fat in a 108-saton mountain park in Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, and he was aware of the fact that he satfs C and satfs C at the site.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A copy of the investigation report (Attachment of the judgment against Defendant B), copy of the judgment of Seoul Southern District Court No. 2016No. 998, and copy of the judgment of Seoul Southern District Court No. 2015 and No. 2587;

1. Investigation report (a copy of the records of trial in case of injury to Defendant B), each protocol of examination of witness (C, D, E), each transcript of each record of examination of witness (C, D, E), confirmation of fact (F), protocol of examination of witness (A), recording book (A);

1. Application of the investigation report (the confirmation of the injury inflicted on Defendant B) statute

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow