Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for assault at the Seoul Northern District Court on June 6, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 14, 2016.

[2] On May 14, 2016, at around 00:25, the Defendant and D used to take a taxi driving by C and used to drive, and subsequently, the Defendant and D were assaulted by C during driving. Since then, while the Defendant and D went away from the taxi, C was tracking back close to D and the Defendant, C was able to track back back the part of C’s shoulder with a brick, which is a dangerous object, and the Defendant immediately fell behind.

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on November 23, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as a special injury to D, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court No. 401, Seoul Northern District Court No. 401, Seoul Northern District Court No. 2016, J. 3456, 201, which was located in Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, and 749, and made a good appearance after the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case.

“To answer the question”, and “all others”

“I not put any question.”

The testimony was made, “I would like to refer to the question of “I would have never committed any assault”, “I would like to refer to “I would like to”; “I would like to refer to the question of “I would like to the question of “I would like to have been 30 meters high at the distance,” and testimony of “I would like to refer to “I would like to the question of “I would like to have been 30 meters high at the distance,” and “I would like to refer to “I would like to have not made any contact.” It was false that D would have been 30 meters far far away from C, so D would not have caused any assault.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A copy of a 16th public complaint; and

1. Copies of the protocol of examination of witness at the order of 16 high court 3456 (part of the protocol of three public trial);

1. A copy of a record of examination of the witness A;

1.16 Copies of evidence records of the order of 3456