logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단3424
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 19, 2015, the Defendant was unable to pay the time limit to the above E while dialogueing with the issue of F and the time limit payment, which is the subject of the number system that the Defendant’s wife E joined in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, which was operated by the Defendant on March 19, 2015.

The F, however, did not spite the Defendant. However, the F, at the time, did not spit the Defendant.

On May 14, 2015, the Defendant prepared a complaint to the effect that “F committed assault, such as spitation, etc. of spitation, on its face on March 19, 2015,” without any spitation, in the process that F, around March 19, 2015, he/she received the above complaint by mail at the general public prosecutor’s office of Nam-dong Incheon Metropolitan City Office of Local Public Prosecutor’s Office of Student-based, Incheon on May 19, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint for the purpose of having the above F punished criminal punishment, and filed a false complaint.

2. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant was present at the court of Law No. 322, Nam-dong Incheon District Court of Law No. 322, Nam-dong, Incheon, Incheon, and testified after being present at the court of law 2015, 2924, as a witness to the above F, and the facts are as follows. The Defendant spiting the Defendant into the Defendant on or around March 19, 2015, without the prosecutor’s “a spiting the Defendant on two occasions on the part of the witness and the chest inside the warehouse, first of all, in the warehouse, the Defendant spited the Defendant on two occasions on the floor, and spited the Defendant on the floor.”

The answer to the prosecutor's question " " is", and the attorney's "a forum was spited on the face of the witness's face and spited on the ground that the defect was spited on the witness's face at first.

The term "to answer", as the case may be.

“The answer was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. A copy of each trial record, and a copy of oath of a witness;

arrow