logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.19 2017고단8357
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:00 on July 14, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case, such as interfering with the performance of official duties to Suwon District Court 308, which was located in Suwon District Court 80, Suwon District Court 2017, the above court 2017, the High Court 1038 C, and D.

In the process, the defendant was found to have been committing, scrupted or pushed down a police officer in the process.

“I do not see any question.”

I examine such cases.

testimony, “However, there was no action to force, injure or injure police officers.”

“Isk, did not do so,” the question “.”

The testimony " and the prosecutor's " and the defendant C and D sent to the police officers."

“Ashes to see the question.”

The testimony " was made in a continuing place," and the police officer could not see it.

It is necessary to judge the question “(s) beyond C and D, as well as the police officers going beyond.”

Then, the Defendants testified that “the Defendants did not go beyond the police officers.”

The testimony called “...” was made to the question “....”.

However, in fact, C testified to the effect that, although police officers Eul tried to arrest C as a flagrant offender in the crime of insulting C by putting the defective uniform, breaking the shoulder, breaking D's hand to arrest C, D's F to restrain it into the floor, and the Defendant continued to keep D's behavior in the above D's part, D's s did not interfere with D's behavior, and the Defendant also testified to the effect that D's s did not interfere with the police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Copies of the examination records (E) and recording records, set forth in the order of 1038, set forth in 2017, whichever is 201;

1. Copies of the examination records (F) and recording records, 2017 High Court Order 1038 (F).

arrow