logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.16 2015고단8026
새마을금고법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who was elected as a candidate for the election of the president of the Saemaul Bank, implemented on April 24, 2015, shall not engage in an election campaign by any means other than appeal for support by means of producing and distributing election campaign bulletins issued by a credit cooperative in connection with the election of executive officers of the Saemaul Bank, appeal for support at a joint speech meeting held by the credit cooperative (including text messages) and computer communications (including e-mail).

1. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around 19:30 to 20:30 on April 8, 2015, based on the following: “A’s name is given to the representatives of the Saemaul Cooperative, including H, I, J, and K, at G cafeteria located in F in the Geum-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

I, in good faith,

I am very likely to do.

The election campaign was carried out in such a way as to appeal for support.

2. On April 10, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime around April 10, 2015, at around 19:30 to 20:40, around the day of April 10, 2015, with the representatives of the E Saemaul Cooperative, such as N,O, P, Q, and R, at the Mcafeteria L L in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan City. The Defendant was dissatisfy upon the request of the president to leave the election of the Chairperson at once.

I am very likely to do.

An election campaign was conducted in a way that appeals for support, such as “.........”

3. On April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 13:00 to 14:00 on April 20, 2015, to the representatives of the Saemaul Undong Cooperative, including H, I, J, K,O, P, and T, at the S cafeteria located in the Singu L of Busan Metropolitan City during the period between around 13:0 to 14:00 on April 20, 2015.

I am very likely to do.

We see well-known.

I, I, upon request of I, I.

An election campaign was conducted in a way that appeals for support, such as “.........”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning U, H,O, J, K, I, N, P, R, Q, T, and V;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of the roster of representatives of the Saemaul Credit Cooperatives and copies of applications for registration of candidates for executive officers;

1. Article 85 (3) and Article 22 (3) of the Saemaul Cooperatives Act (Selection of Penalty) of the same Act concerning the facts of the offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow