A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:30 on July 5, 2013, the Defendant requested the cancellation of the contract for the sale of the G, C, C, and C, C, and C, C, C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, and C, were damaged the property of the victim by tearing the contract.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 366 (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. Part dismissing the prosecution in consideration of the following factors: Seven times of a fine related to violence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; one time of suspended sentence; four times of a fine for dual punishment; however, the number of crimes subject to a fine for dual punishment is inferior; the damage is minor; the victim's non-existence of punishment; the victim's age and serious reflect

1. The summary of the facts charged is that, at the time and place of the facts charged, there are 5 to 6 employees and believers, the Defendant conspired with G to “I am not a female fraud group” and “C” to “I am feas,” and thereby publicly insulting G by saying C to “I amfas”.

2. The judgment is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, subject to a complaint subject to prosecution under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since G, the recording of which was the complaint, was recognized as having withdrawn the complaint against the Defendant on February 6, 2015, the date of the instant indictment, the determination is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.