logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.02.16 2016고단1069
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 30, 2014, Defendant B: (a) provided the fourth floor of the D Building in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on a deposit of KRW 2,00,000,000 for monthly rent of KRW 1,50,000; and (b) provided the signboard “EM teachers” to be “EM teachers”; (c) installed a legal branch; and (d) returned the leaflet to many and unspecified people on the street; and (e) provided the YI who received money for the use of 1,00,000-3,000-3,000-3,000 won in the cost of cremation land, sugar, and so on.

Defendant

A is a person who receives 30% of the profits from the operation of one teacher in the House from Defendant B and gives lectures to the believers collected by Defendant B with respect to the Buddhist ceremony, and individually ask the sellingr of the house and ask the sellingr of the house in order to see the parallel acceptance and the tolerance of the house without the consciousness of the Buddhist ceremony. A is a person who plays a role in purchasing the line conversations and so on.

As above, the Defendants recruited victims by providing them at the intermittent value, and misrepresented them as E’s staff even if they did not actually registered as E’s staff, and conspired to defraud money by deceiving victims even if they did not receive money from the victims under the pretext of a plaque, sporaction, and charnel, even though they did not have any intent or ability to provide it.

From around July 30, 2014, the Defendants reported that the Defendants did not have any intention or ability to provide a plaque, a plaque, a conversation, a charnel house, etc. even if they received money from the victims, and reported that they did not have any son who was missing at the time of June 25 incident.

In addition, it is possible to keep the history of the proposal because it is good for him to do so.

No. 3.

arrow