A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 05:50, the Daejeon Central Police Station Eaboxed by D, his mother, who was brought up by him on the domestic violence case at around 05:50, the Defendant: (b) followed D’s intention that “I wish to go to the Women’s Protection Center” to deliver the female to the Women’s Protection Center; (c) obstructed F’s body by carrying out temporary measures; and (d) she took a bath with F’s face and body, and she took a bath, and she took a view, thereby obstructing the police officer’s execution of his/her duties. In the process of arresting him/her, the Defendant she interfered with the police officer’s body and the police officer’s body during the execution of his/her duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each law on witness GF's statutory statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation]; consideration of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; the obstruction of performance of official duties (type 1); the basic area; six months to one year and four months (Pronouncement 1); the term of imprisonment with prison labor for six months; two months to one year and four months; two times as a fine relating to violence for two years of suspended sentence; three times as a contingent event; the circumstances surrounding the crime are considered; active efforts to recover from damage; the police officer’s efforts to not punish him; the age