logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.21 2020고단826
특수강요
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B The Seoul is a D Estetic business owner in the third floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul building, and the victim E (42 years old) is a manological business operator, and the defendant, B and the victim have entered into the said Esteological design contract.

A part of the facts charged is revised ex officio because it is not objectively confirmed whether the defendant and B are mother and child relationship.

In this way, it is judged that there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right of defense.

On June 1, 2019, around 16:36, the Defendant, along with B, allowed the victim to enter the above construction site on the ground that the water used in the washing machine at the construction site of the above Estetype, was not drained, and the Defendant stated that the Defendant would late to deliver money by leaving the knife, which is a dangerous object, to the victim, and the Defendant was kneee of the above victim, who was at the risk of the victim.

Since then, the defendant and Eul have the victim write down a letter of "I will compensate for 0 million won in the form of a work delay, I will write down the work completion as a gold, and I will write down a letter of "The 500, 300 on June 8, 200, 500 on July 30, and the victim's name, etc. and affix a seal."

As a result, the defendant, together with B, threatened the victim by carrying dangerous objects, and caused the victim to do an act of non-performance of obligation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. The CD reproduction result (No. 3 No.);

1. Domestic history reports (Submission of evidence by the victim), investigation reports (Submission of second data by the victim), and the defendant argues to the effect that the facts themselves are dead, but the criminal intent is denied. The circumstances known by the above evidence, namely, bringing B knife and face, without any context, brought up a knife, and the defendant also brought a knife back to the victim after he was frighted back with the victim, and knife to the victim.

arrow