logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.12.23 2020고단2222
특수재물손괴
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are the members of the G church reform council.

Although the Defendants requested a church to allow the youth center of the new road branch to be used, the Defendants were refused. However, in collusion with H to order H to destroy and enter the entrance of the youth center by using tools, such as telefluor, sluor, and electric drying, which are dangerous objects, and around 09:0 on August 5, 2018, at the same time as G principal youth center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, Defendant A, under the direction of H, she laid the entrance door of the river branch and walked up to two floors at the luh and electric drying, and walked down the entrance of the river branch, Defendant B, who was next to the entrance, she laid off the entrance door several times with the lushe and electric drying, and Defendant C operated the front door with the entrance to turn on between the door and the wall, Defendant D 1 and Defendant D 2 destroyed the entrance to the extent that it was possible to repair the door and repair the door to the extent that it was destroyed.

In addition, the Defendants were released to the first floor, and among them, the Defendants said that the other Defendants did not come to the Defendant C and did not leave the door, and Defendant C destroyed the unclaimed glass entrance in the market.

Accordingly, the defendants carried dangerous goods in collusion with H and damaged the property of the victim G church.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic images by field documentary evidence and capturings;

1. Relevant Articles 369(1), 366, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order

1. The church reform council including the Defendants’ summary of the assertion.

arrow