(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고정1885

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고정1885

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14:10 on September 5, 2017, the Defendant driven BYM 124CC at a section of about 100 meters, without a motor device driver’s license, on the two kinds of parks located in the south-gu, Daegu-gu, about 128, in front of the same Do-do bathing site.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, as seen above, operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by the mandatory automobile insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

3. In the event of unlawful uttering of official document, the Defendant did not wear a safety appearance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 and carried out the foregoing Oba, and was asked to present a driver’s license as he was discovered to D by the Gyeong-gu National Police Agency C, Daegu National Police Agency C, and was in possession of the Defendant’s official document, and exercised the official document by presenting the Defendant’s first class ordinary driver’s license for E as her own, to the Defendant’s relative-gu issuance of the official document.

4. When the Defendant was discovered at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, the Defendant entered “E” in the column, which is the statement of the vehicle operation by using the scriptive pension, and entered “E” in the name of the Defendant’s column of the “E” and affixed E’s signature on the name of the “E”, and then issued “E” in the name subsequent to the name of the Defendant, a senior police officer in charge of the crackdown who is aware of the forgery of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the vehicle operation statement and the voluntary accompanying consent form in E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of operation, mandatory insurance inquiry, photographs, and written consent to voluntary accompanying of each vehicle;

1.The application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation reporting.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.11.24 2017고단1088

-광주지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단1440

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.01.16 2016고단2387

-서울남부지방법원 2017.02.03 2017고단100

-수원지방법원 2017.06.07 2016고단7584