beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A (61) is a taxi driver, and the victim C (a person) is not aware of each other as the settlement source of D's business office charges. The defendant sent a receipt for the settlement of charges at D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D'' on November 27, 2016, in the course of giving and taking a receipt for the settlement of charges, and the victim was set up at 30 meters from the frontline of the settlement of charges, and the victim was "p's typ, this chewing, the balth, the balth, the balthr, and the balthr's name."
“In the process of taking a bath, etc. and putting a name tag attached to the victim’s chest, the victim’s left chest was sent to his/her hand, as if the victim’s loss were, and committed an indecent act by force on his/her female.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;
1. It is denied that three copies of the investigation report (in the event of this case, the defendant only carried out a name tag to verify the victim's name at the time of this case, and that there is no little difference between the victim's chest and the victim's chest.
(1) However, the victim is credibility in light of the following: (a) the investigative agency and this court consistently and specifically stated the situation at the time of the occurrence of the damage; (b) it is difficult to find out the grounds for the victim to make a false statement with regard to the Defendant’s act;
(B) At the time, the East F, who had worked in the next Switzerland, was present in this Court, and the parts such as the Defendant and the victim appeared and did not specifically contact with the Defendant. However, the damaged person at the time, was inside of the Defendant, so that the damaged person was “the customer nit, if you do so.”
The phrase “as accurate,” and the victim was unable to work properly since the instant case, because he did not neglect the appraisal.
(3) The name of the victim is clearly indicated in the statement, and the name of the victim is clearly indicated, so that the defendant can confirm the name of the victim.