beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 12, 2015, at around 08:14, the Defendant: (a) took part in D Station Customer Support room located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant: (b) took part of the victim E (the age of 26) and the part of the victim’s breast part of the refund of the transportation card in order to verify the relevant transportation card; (c) took part in the side immediately adjacent sales room of the above customer support room to check the relevant transportation card; and (d) committed an indecent act by coercioning the victim’s breast part into one part of the victim’s left breast part; and (d) took part of the victim’s breast part into part of the victim’s chest, one time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. The video of CCTV video CD at the scene of the crime (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the fact that the defendant tried to confirm the victim's name tag or that there was no fact that the victim's chest part was involved, so the victim's act and the victim's chest part was lawfully adopted and investigated as follows: ① The victim appeared in this court and stated about the situation at the time of the crime; ① the situation before and after the crime of this case as well as before and after the crime of this case; ② the statement about the defendant's behavior (recoging out his fingers), the victim's shot sense, etc. at the time of the crime of this case is consistent with the victim's behavior; ② The credibility can be acknowledged; ② the situation at the time when the victim can be confirmed by CCTV image (the defendant's body towards the victim's body and the victim's body to avoid the defendant's action) also conforms to the victim's statement; considering the fact that the defendant's behavior of this case and its criminal intent are sufficient, but the defendant's name and the defendant's counsel's whereabouts are not justified.