beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 21:40 on March 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was on board the train in Busan FTX No. 218 train No. 218 train in Busan FTX 18, the Defendant tried to find out the fact that the railroad crew C (V, 30 years old) who was a witness of the fact that the Defendant was on board the train in Busan was on board during the inspection, and to issue the passenger tickets for the free boarding fare between the Busan FTX and the Dong area.
Accordingly, the Defendant: “I see why I want to have the right to buy the franking ticket between the Busan Station and the East Zone”; “I see why I Dop?? I see why I Dop?? I see why I Dop?? I see why I Dop?? I see that I am going to the guest room passage between the train 17 and 18, and that I am "I am you am you am. I am you am you am. I am you am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am? I am. I see that I am a name tag worn by C around I her arrival in the East Zone.”
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the performance of duties of railroad workers by assault and threat.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;
1. A complaint;
1. A criminal investigation report (including a photograph of wearing a working clothes of a complainant), and a photograph of working uniforms of the complainants;
1. Investigation report (case related to the submission of video CDs), and video CDs at the time of committing the crime;
1. A report on investigation (a video verification case submitted by the complainant), and a photograph to the extent that the defendant gets off by cutting off the complainants;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of witnesses;
1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Safety of Railroad and the bill of indictment for the selection of punishment are stated in the Act on the Safety of Railroad, but in light of the name of the crime and the facts charged, it appears to be a clear clerical error in the Act on the Safety of Railroad, so it is such Act.