logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고정3371
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 21, 2013, around 18:00, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) on the customer column of the application for subscription to a new contract for the SK Telecom Services Co., Ltd. within the store located in Osan City B, the Defendant entered the name “D: name: E, resident number number F, address: G, and applicant column”; and (b) signed on the name side by the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, submitted the forged application form to an employee whose name is unknown, as if the said application form was genuine.

3. In the customer information column of a new contract for LGU mobile phone service at the same date and at the same place as paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) stated “A: resident registration number; (b) H; G; and telephone number; and (c) the deposit holder: I; (c) bank name: the national; and (d) the applicant column as “D” and signed by the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, submitted the falsified mobile phone entrance application form to an employee whose name is unknown, as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A copy of a new service contract (SK Telecom), and a copy of the application for subscription (LGU);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (the same type of criminal suspect and recovery of his/her right of appeal), shall be applied by statutes;

arrow