logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1989. 12. 12. 선고 89도495 판결
[사기,배임수재][집37(4)형,507;공1990.2.1(865),301]
Main Issues

The meaning of illegal solicitation in the crime of taking property in breach of trust.

Summary of Judgment

The crime of taking property in breach of trust is protected by the law of integrity of a person in charge of another's business, and illegal solicitation, which is a constituent element of the crime, is not up to the crime of occupational breach of trust. However, as in this case, it is against social rules or the principle of good faith, such as giving priority to recommending a specific person to a certain position.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 357(1) of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 88No56 delivered on February 23, 1989

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

We examine the Defendant’s grounds of appeal.

Article 357 (1) of the Criminal Code provides that the crime of taking property in breach of trust shall be protected by the law of integrity of a person who administers another's business, and illegal solicitation, which is a constituent element of the crime, refers to solicitation which is contrary to social rules or the principle of good faith, even though it does not constitute occupational breach of trust

According to the facts duly established by the court below, the defendant, as the head of the branch office of Korea Electric Power Corporation, was a person in charge of the recommending business of the entrusted collection officer, and the non-indicted 1 was recommended as a collection officer after receiving a request to recommend him first on the job, even if Non-indicted 1, who is the entrusted collection officer, retired from office, the defendant received 2,200,000 won from him, and recommended non-indicted 1 as a collection officer. Thus, the solicitation to recommend a specific person first to any position, such as the above decision of the court below, is a solicitation against the principle of trust and good faith. Therefore, the court below's decision that recognized the establishment of the crime of taking property in breach of trust

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim Sang-won (Presiding Justice) Lee Jong-won (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-광주지방법원 1989.2.23.선고 88노56
본문참조조문