logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 09. 22. 선고 2017누46044 판결
‘주식 등’에는 우선주도 포함될 분만 아니라 보통주와 우선주를 합산하여 100억 원을 초과하는지 여부를 판단해야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2016Gudan24093 ( October 18, 2017)

Title

It is necessary to determine whether the aggregate of common shares and preferential shares exceeds 10 billion won, not only the portion to be included in the preferred shares, but also the portion to be included in the shares.

Summary

(1) Article 157(4) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act provides that a corporation shall own 3/100 or more of the total sum of its stocks, etc. and the market price of its stocks, etc. shall be at least 10 billion won, and there shall be no provision that only the stocks with voting rights shall be limited to the stocks with voting rights, or that there shall be no provision

Related statutes

Article 157 (Scope of Securities Depository Securities and Large Stockholders) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2017Nu46044 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AAA and 1

Defendant, Appellant

The head of Yangcheon Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Gudan24093 decided April 18, 2017

Conclusion of Pleadings

August 25, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

September 22, 2017

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance court shall be revoked. The defendant's imposition of the capital gains tax of 2012 on September 10, 2015 on the plaintiff Kim Jong-sung and the imposition of the capital gains tax of 2012 on September 8, 2015 on the plaintiff Kim Jong-sung shall be revoked, respectively.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this decision are as follows: Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

If so, all of the plaintiffs' claims shall be dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed.

Since the plaintiffs' appeal is justified as just, it is dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of grounds.

arrow