beta
Text
The imprisonment with prison labor for A shall be one year and six months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B shall be determined by one year, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On June 9, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 6, 2014.
【Criminal Facts】
In order to stabilize the residence of homeless workers, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport operates a system of lending the worker deposit fund at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the worker deposit fund with the National Housing Fund.
Bloyer and Defendants prepared a false housing lease contract, employment certificate, etc. with Defendant B as a false lessor and Defendant A as a false lessee, and submitted them to financial institutions and offered them to divide the loans by receiving workers' house lease loan in the name of a false lessee.
Defendant
B In March 2012, 2012, B notified broman of his personal information and the address of 103 Dong 1302 of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment 103 Dong 1302, his own possession, and Broman made false loan contract that Defendant B leases apartment bonds to Defendant A at KRW 200 million, and made false employment certificates, certificates of income tax withholding, and wage ledger that Defendant A is working for a stock company E, and delivered them to Defendant A, and Defendant A made a false move-in report at the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fro Community Center, obtained a fixed date in the whole contract, and obtained a fixed date on March 16, 2012 by using the documents related to employment and the lease contract, and applied for loan of KRW 80 million to employees in charge of loan at the station of the Han Bank, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, for the loan of the National Housing Fund of KRW 106,000,000,000,000 as if the loan was actually used.
However, the lease contract was made by falsity, and Defendant A.