beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A, Defendant B, D, E, F, and G’s joint crime of national land transport system operates the employee house lease loan system with interest rate lower than the mid-term interest rate if an application for a loan is filed with only certain documents, such as a certificate of employment, detailed statement of salary, etc. without any special security, and a charter contract, to stabilize the residence of homeless workers with financial resources of the National Housing Fund.
However, the financial institution entrusted with the above loan-related affairs gives a loan to the employee house leasing fund only by the formal examination, and in particular, in the case of workers, gives a loan to the above house leasing fund as a collateral if only the documents related to employment are submitted to the financial institution, which is well known, with the intention of inducing falsely the lessee and the lessor to act as a lessor, preparing a false lease contract document and a certificate of employment with the financial institution to obtain the employee house leasing fund from the financial institution.
Specifically, D(one name H) and E recruited lessors and lessees to enter into a false lease contract, prepare loan-related documents, such as false employment certificate, etc. necessary for the loan, and falsely lessors entered into a lease contract as if they have leased their residence falsely. G, which is a real estate broker, entered into a false lease contract, and submitted a false lease contract, and Defendant A, a false lessee entered into a false lease contract, submitted a false employment certificate, etc. to the financial institution, and Defendant B applied for the employee house lease loan loan to the financial institution, and Defendant B took part in the role as the employee of the financial institution in charge of the financial institution, by collecting the employee house lease fund from the financial institution and divided it in sequence.
D and E, according to the above public offering, around March 27, 2013, Defendant A is “I”.