logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.01.23 2013가단21465
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,00,000 as well as its annual 5% from October 25, 2012 to January 23, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 24, 2012, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident that took place on February 24, 2012, when the financial resources construction company went beyond the construction site of access roads to the common industrial complex under construction (hereinafter “first accident”).

The Plaintiff was treated at B Hospital, and was diagnosed by “the pelle outside of the upper pelle of the pelle of the pelle,” “the part of the pelle of the slele of the slele of the slele of the sle of the sle of the sle of the sle of the side,” “the part of the side of the sle of the sle

On February 27, 2012, the Plaintiff received “mathical and meatological therapy” from B Hospital, and received medical treatment by September 6, 2012.

B. On October 25, 2012, the Plaintiff, on October 25, 2012, stopped in accordance with a stop signal while driving Cchip car (hereinafter “instant passenger car”) on the road prior to 08:30 Sinsan-si, 08:30 Sinsan-si, 654, Sinung-ri, Seoul High School (hereinafter “instant passenger car”). D bus caused an accident in which the rear part of the instant passenger car was received (hereinafter “second accident”).

C. On October 25, 2012, the Plaintiff, including the progress of treatment, received medical treatment at a hospital B, and was diagnosed at the same time as “the slovas fever,” “the slovas slovas slovas slovas slovas slovas,” “the slovas slovas slovas slovas l

(Date of Issuance of Certificate of Diagnosis, December 10, 2012). The Plaintiff received treatment from E-U.S. E-U., and again hospitalized in B Hospital, and received re-treatment on February 21, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 6, Gap evidence 7, Eul evidence 1 through Eul evidence 3, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Since the above bus at the time of the occurrence of liability for damages estimated the passenger car of this case, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the second accident to the mutual aid association which concluded a mutual aid agreement for the above bus.

3...

arrow