1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. While the Plaintiff was on March 6, 2006 and was serving in the training center on March 6, 2006, the Plaintiff lost balance in the actions of the training center and impacted on the ground of knee knee fel fel.

B. On June 20, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the right sleak fever, the sleak-man, the right sleak-man, the inner half of the year, and was diagnosed as the sleak-man, the right sleak-man, the right sleak-man, the right sleak-man, the right sleak-man, and the internal half of the year.

C. On October 11, 2006, the Plaintiff filed for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the Defendant on November 2006, to the Defendant, who was in the military education and training of the Defendant, and applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the Domination of the Domination of the Domination of the Domination of the Republic of Korea, the Domination of the Domination of the Domination of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “instant wounds”).

On May 30, 2007, the Plaintiff was recognized as a soldier, police officer, and police officer of the instant case from the Defendant, and conducted a physical examination at the Busan Veterans Hospital on May 30, 2007.

On July 5, 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff received re-performance in the c hospital located in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, the right slives of the Republic of Korea, and re-payment in the anti-slives of the internal side.

On June 3, 2014, the Plaintiff conducted a follow-up physical examination at the Central Veterans Hospital, and also was determined to fall short of the disability rating standards.

E. On October 27, 2016, the Plaintiff conducted the second follow-up physical examination at the Busan Veterans Hospital, but was determined to fall short of the disability rating standard.

F. On December 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) determined the Plaintiff as a soldier or policeman wounded on duty under Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) and notified the Plaintiff on the same day on the ground that “the degree of disability with respect to the instant disability falls short of the criteria for the degree

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The ground for recognition] does not dispute, and