logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.11.17 2015누6650
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 요건 비해당결정처분취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 22, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on February 26, 2014 while serving in the Army.

B. On March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of merit with the Plaintiff, on the ground that “The B Hospital was diagnosed as a pansty, an internal half of half of half of half of half of half of half of half of the year, and received an anti-half of half of half of the year to the right,” arguing that “the B Hospital received an anti-half of half of half of the year to the right, and received an anti-half of half of the year to the right,” on March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of merit on the following grounds: (a) X-ray taken X-Ey at the National Armed Forces, via a third compulsory area, through the third compulsory area; and (b) taken the RI at a private hospital; and (c) was diagnosed as a anti-half of half of the half of the year to the right, which is a spansty spansty, the right side of the spansty.”

C. On July 9, 2014, following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement to the purport that “it is difficult to regard the instant wound as an injury incurred on December 2013, 201,” the Defendant rendered a decision non-conformity of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no causal relationship with the performance

(hereinafter referred to as "the Disposition in this case"). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On June 2012, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that he was admitted to the Plaintiff was only knee-free and knee-free in the field of knee-feeee-feeee-feeee-fee-feee-fee-fee-fe-ge-ge-ge-ge-ge-ge-ge-ge-ge

A normal judgment was also issued in the pre-entry draft physical.

However, on December 14, 2013, after entering the bar, knenee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne knee knee knee knee knee knee s

arrow