logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.02.13 2013누2389
국가유공자요건비해당처분취소
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff falling under the part of the order of revocation shall be revoked;

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 12, 2001, the Plaintiff entered the Air Force, and served as a military police guard of the B military police corps, and was injured at the right knee of the military dog among the military forces guard of the B, around 15:00 on October 3, 2001.

B. On October 19, 2001, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the result of the MRI’s inspection conducted at the Mamasan Hospital on Mamasan Hospital, that “the U.S. M. M. M. M. M. S. M. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S

C. On November 5, 2002, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that the Plaintiff was different from the Defendant, and was recognized as a person of distinguished service to the State on November 5, 2002, but was judged below the rating of injury as a result of the fourth physical examination.

On December 2, 2011, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished services to the State again to the Defendant on December 2, 201, with the difference between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, “Semanman Myman Myman Myman Myman, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2,

E. On April 24, 2012, the Plaintiff, in a physical examination for re-verification, was suspended on the grounds that it was necessary for the Plaintiff to review the examination data on both sides of the shipping-related white hospital, which was diagnosed and treated, on the ground that it was determined that the examination data on the examination on both sides of the shipping-related white hospital was in short of the grading standard.

Accordingly, on July 17, 2012, the Defendant rendered a disposition under the disability ratings application criteria to the Plaintiff, which did not meet the prescribed disability ratings applicable under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”).

b.0.0 c.

arrow