logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.12.11 2015가단18982
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From December 28, 2009, the Plaintiff served as the employee of the automobile parts manufacturing headquarters run by Defendant C from December 28, 2009.

B. At around 08:50 on October 7, 201, the Plaintiff confirmed the inside of the gold-type with the head of the department B, a responsible person, while checking whether the gold-type defect was found in the process of manufacturing presses within the aforementioned D factory. At the time, the Plaintiff confirmed the gold-type inside the gold-type with the head of the department B, who was in charge. At the time, the Plaintiff was inflicted an injury upon the Plaintiff’s hands out between the gold and the gold-type, with the Plaintiff’s hands down between the gold-type and the Defendant’s hands down.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant C seeking damages incurred by the instant accident under the Daegu District Court Decision 2013Kadan16388, and the Plaintiff asserted in the complaint that “Defendant B was slicked on the wind to place put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to put to place to put to place to put to place to put to place to put to place to put to place to put to place to put to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place

On December 18, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the Daegu District Court on the ground that “the Plaintiff, despite being aware that safety devices have been taken, was put in place, without due care for himself, to put put in put put in put in put in place the place of put in place at the press room, and the Plaintiff’s mistake also caused the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident. Therefore, the Defendant’s responsibility is limited to 60%,” on the ground that “The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff 30,916,193 won and the amount equivalent to 5% per annum from November 8, 2011 to December 18, 2014, and 20% per annum from the next day to December 18, 2014.”

On August 20, 2015, both appeals filed by the two parties, and on August 20, 2015, the presses are operated for reasons not known to the Daegu District Court.

arrow