1. The Defendant’s KRW 204,496,180 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 23, 2017 to July 10, 2019, and the following.

The defendant is a company that manufactures reflect safety signs and steel structure, and the plaintiff is the employee of the defendant.

On May 23, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) while running the instant press 2 heading (hereinafter “instant press 2”) in the Defendant’s Defendant’s place of business, caused the product to be put in the instant gold bareboat, without blocking all of them; (b) deducted the products from the left hand in the said gold bund without using tools, such as gathering, etc.; (c) cut off the press 2,3,4 balance of the press 2,3,4 balance, and the Plaintiff’s left hand; and (d) thereby, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of the Plaintiff’s losses of cutting down and cutting down the press 2,4 balance of the press 2,3,4 balance of the press 2,5 balance of 5 balance of the braces and 5 balance of the bunding balance of the bund and the bunding bund and the bund

(hereinafter “instant accident.” At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant did not provide the Plaintiff with detailed safety education regarding the method of safely removing the product in the instant presses. If the presses were to display the presses, the Defendant operated into the air if the presses were to have the presses, and thus, even if the presses were to take the presses, even if the presses were to aground, there was no separate safety device to prevent the misworking, even if there was the risk of the accident, even if the presses were to aground.

[Ground of recognition] According to the above facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

In full view of the purport of the aforementioned evidence’s argument, the Plaintiff also erred by inserting losses inside the above gold-type in order to deduct products without blocking all of the presses of this case from the presses of this case, and without using the presses of this case. The Plaintiff’s error above is the accident of this case.