logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.18 2016가단122840
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A in KRW 83,247,508, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A is a person who entered into an employment contract with Defendant B, and Defendant Young-jin is a company dispatched from Defendant B to Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

B and Plaintiff C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

B. On July 3, 2015, Plaintiff B entered into a labor contract with Defendant B Co., Ltd., the place of work, and the contents of work, as a production assistance, and dispatched to Defendant Young-jin Co., Ltd., and served as a direct official who performs press activities at presses.

The instant steel marketing work was to put a steel plate with a width of 60-70 cm, vertical length of 30 cm, and thickness of 2-3 cm above the gold-type at the bottom of the press box by the work operator, and to make the gold-type of the press press at the bottom of the press box, and to have the gold-type of the press press handling at the bottom of the press box, and to continuously repeat the steel plates processed by the work operator.

C. On July 14, 2015, Plaintiff A worked in Youngjin Co., Ltd. and started work at around 08:00 to 10:10, and thereafter, Plaintiff A again operated the presses to resume work after rest.

However, on the wind that Plaintiff A proceeds in a continuous state without having the position of presses as a safety-1 administration, there was an accident where 4 balance of the presses was cut off except for Plaintiff A’s excellent balance of the presses (hereinafter “accident”).

[Plaintiff asserts to the effect that Plaintiff A did not continue to work in a continuous state with the position of the presses. However, it is stated that Plaintiff A continued to carry out the industrial accident compensation insurance application of this case (No. 7 No. 2 of the evidence No. 7-2 that Plaintiff A continued to carry out the presses without being placed as a safe one administration, and as seen below, if the heading location of the presses is in a safe one administration state, the presses are temporarily suspended once after the operation.

arrow