A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

【criminal career” The Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for the crime of interference with business at the Seoul Western District Court on April 17, 2013, which became final and conclusive on April 25, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On February 2014, the Defendant: (a) around February 2, 2014, around 10 minutes of the disturbance of approximately 10 minutes of the disturbance, such as, under the influence of alcohol at “Eju” operated by the victim D of the 1st underground floor in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant prevented customers who had entered the main points of the disturbance, such as, “In-flight Malada”, “In-flight Malada” from entering the 10 minutes of the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. The Defendant: (a) on February 201, 201, 1. A

In the place indicated in the port, F and the Defendant lent money as a matter of money, the city expenses were to be punished, such as cutting and destroying the bat of the above F F, and destroying the flowers at that place, and all customers of the main point were to go up.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on May 12, 2014, at the “H market located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government” operated by the victim I (the 48 years of age) and without any justifiable reason, she taken a bath, such as “a sprinking,” etc., to customers who were at the same time, and took time, on the ground that the said victim prevented him/her from doing so; and (b) she took the face of his/her female on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of punishment for suspects);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.