beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On March 20, 2018, at around 03:00, the Defendant discovered from the first floor of D building located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, that the victim E was locked with a password equivalent to KRW 800,000 of the market price of the victim E at least KRW 800,000, the victim E at the same time, and the Defendant cut off with the locks with the above locks and the above bicycles with a secret number of KRW 15,000, the market price of the same victim owned.
2. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;
A. On April 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obtained one bicycle for a verification color that does not know the lost market price that was lost by a person who was unable to know in the Republic of Korea, located in the 1270 U.S. East-gu, U.S. at the center of U.S.-dong, U.S., 1270.
The defendant did not follow necessary procedures such as returning the bicycle that he acquired as above to the victim and did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
B. On February 2018, the Defendant acquired one unit of Samsung Gallon 6 mobile phone at the time of Samsung Gallon ju, which was owned by the victim F, lost on the roads near the Dong basin located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.
The defendant did not take necessary procedures such as returning the acquired mobile phone to the victim and did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
(c)
On March 2018, the Defendant found one of the LG G5 mobile phones owned by the victim G from around E-art located in the 400 Cheongcheon-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, about the end of March, 2018.
The defendant did not take necessary procedures such as returning the acquired mobile phone to the victim and did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Protocol of the police statement with regard to G.