A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the Claundry Facility located in Gyeonggi-gun Group B.

On April 20, 2015, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Victim F (56) who avoided disturbance on the grounds that the Defendant was suspected of having not paid a charge, in the “E Sabya” located in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in front of the above so-called “C laundry”, had a cundry (Evidence No. 1), which is a dangerous object in the said “C laundry”, and had spawned the victim, and had spawned the victim by entering the above laund with the victim immediately before the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement concerning F in the protocol of suspect interrogation of the police officer;

1. Entry of a protocol of seizure and the list of seizure, a photograph thereof, and the application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc., of community service and order to attend lectures;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of applicable sentences under the law] [the scope of applicable sentences under the law] Imprisonment with prison labor for not more than seven years [the type of judgment] Type 4 (Habitual, Cumulative, and Special Intimidation) of intimidation among the violent crime groups [the scope of recommended sentences] mitigation area: Non-execution area of punishment [the scope of recommended sentences] mitigation area: From April to June [the decision of sentence] 1 year in six months in the suspension of execution, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years (22, 63 pages in the record of evidence) with the victim's actual response, and the defendant did not appear to be seriously against the court.

However, the accused has been led to the confession of the crime, only the previous conviction of the fine, and there is no record of criminal punishment for about six years prior to the instant case, and the victim does not want the punishment of the accused (Evidence Record 36,41 pages), and