Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant stated that around 10:32 on November 9, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime at around 10:04, according to the following part of the judgment as to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant’s correction is deemed to have committed a crime at around 10:32.

In the parking lot in the Gumi-si B, it damages the front right side of the EP car owned by the victim D, which is a dangerous object of the EP car owned by the victim, without any special reason, to the knife amounting to 416,000 won of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on internal investigation, report on internal investigation (on-site verification), report on investigation (the result of execution of a warrant of seizure, search, and verification, attaching a photograph of seized articles, verification of the statement by a replacement maintenance business operator, presumption of the same suspect in two cases, attaching a photograph of the appearance that was cut down immediately after the crime, and attaching a quotation of damage to two cases);

1. Investigation and verification (the case date and the day preceding the case, the confirmation of CCTV images, the confirmation of the length of a transmission place, etc., and the illegality of a suspect's defense counsel against carrying a transmission place);

1. Each of the records of seizure (afford submission) (the defendant asserts that there is no string of the typists. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant's car owned by the victim on the day of the instant case (hereinafter referred to as "victims car") is classified as "victims car").

(i) The fact that there has been three instances in the future side of the right side of the damaged vehicle (Evidence No. 1:7, 12, 13). The defendant confirmed that the damaged vehicle has been parked in the rear side of the store he works at around 10:30 on the day of this case, and then he returned to the store immediately next to the damaged vehicle, and he returned to the store again at around 10:32 on the right side of the damaged vehicle, and he had the transmitting (Evidence No. 1:9-24, 33-38, 66-68 of the evidence record). The fact that the damaged vehicle's maintenance business operator also stated that the part side of the damaged vehicle has been 3-4 times in the middle as well as in the middle part, such as the invoice and the last day of the damaged vehicle's maintenance business operator, and that the defendant has made a statement that she has made a statement that she has paid me to me (Evidence No. 16346,646.64.64).