A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

A seized 2 metre (No. 1) shall be forfeited.

Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Criminal facts

On December 26, 2016, around 00:30 on December 26, 2016, the Defendant was in the front of the D main office located in Busan Yagu C, and was in the middle of the river.

E, while receiving a claim from the husband of E for an act of scambling in the scambling, he took an attitude that the victim F ( South, 21 years of age), G ( South, 22 years of age), and H ( South, and 21 years of age) in the vicinity of the victim F (hereinafter referred to as the "FF") was in the vicinity of the dangerous object, and the victim seems to have been in the middle of the day.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from wooden persons and reporting thereon);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (a punishment provided for in special intimidation against F, the most severe punishment for a crime);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act did not seem to have taken the defendant's attitude toward the victims who have taken out the place, and he/she taken out the place.

It argues that the defendant's act did not have an intention to notify the harm that could constitute a crime of intimidation, and it cannot be deemed that the defendant's act did not have a sufficient harm that would cause fear to the victims.

However, the witness F stated in this court the process that the defendant made E and her husband with the trial expenses, and the defendant made a statement by describing in detail and in detail the current situation such as the process that the defendant sacrifiess the victims of the Ama to the victims of the Ama.

The statements are consistent with the statements made by the witness F in the police, except for those which are minor, and have been in the same place.

G.