logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2016나32796
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "(3) the 19th "(3) disability of an outdoor employee" on the 3rd "the 19th "(3)" on the 3rd "the 19th "the 3rd "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the vocational coefficient of an indoor employee" is reasonable to view the 3rd "the 19th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th "the 5th " the vocational coefficient of an outdoor employee")" on the 5th "the 5th "the 3th "the 5th "the court" on the 19th "the 1st "the court" is the 1st "the 3th "the 5th "the 1st "court"". It shall be cited as it is in accordance

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is legitimate on the same conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow